DeKay Receives
Award to Study Single and Repeated Play Decisions
Michael
DeKay (Heinz/EPP) has received a grant from the National Science Foundation
to study Single-Play and Repeated Play Decisions with Fungible
and Non-Fungible Outcomes.
Something is fungible if one part
or quantity may be replaced by another equal part or quantity in the
satisfaction of an obligation. Oil, grain, and money are usually considered
to be fungible. In the context of repeated monetary gambles, the money
won in one gamble can replace the money lost in another, dollar for
dollar. In other decision contexts, the outcomes of repeated trials
may not be fungible. Consider, for example, a medical practice guideline
that recommends surgery for a particular ailment. In one instance, successful
surgery may extend the patients life by some number of years.
In another instance, unsuccessful surgery may result in the patients
immediate death. The life lost by the second patient cannot, in any
real sense, be replaced by an equal quantity of life from the first
patient.
Perceived fungibility is important
because it may affect how people make decisions. When considering decisions
about monetary gambles, people often make different decisions when they
can play the gamble many times instead of just once, because they realize
that the money won in one gamble can replace the money lost in another.
For example, many people would decline a gamble that provides a 50%
chance of a $200 gain and a 50% chance of a $100 loss (a single-play
decision), but would readily accept a series of 10 or 100 plays of the
same gamble (a repeated-play decision). However, when outcomes are perceived
to be non-fungible, as in the surgery example above, it is expected
that people will not make different decisions when there are multiple
patients instead of just one, because good outcomes do not really offset
bad outcomes.
Miller
- continued from pg. 3
and
societal terms, as well as management and policy issues as related to
IT. It will prepare students to design and deploy enterprise information
systems in private and public sector settings. The BSc will prepare
graduates to be broader and more flexible IT professionals who can work
at the interface of business and technology. Details on the new
school, which Miller believes is the first of its kind, can be found
at
http://www.smu.edu.sg/sections/
schools/information.asp.
Carnegie Mellon is assisting the
development of the new school through a four-year agreement under which
it is sharing its best practices and providing counsel to SESs
education programs and a research center.
Miller notes that Carnegie
Mellon brings a wealth of educational experience in technology, business
and policy programs and integration across these areas. SMU recognizes
the value of providing students with a multi-disciplinary educational
experience. With this partnership, our program will be greatly enhanced.
SIS will admit a first undergraduate
class of 100 students in August and hopes to have over 600 at all levels
by 2006. Miller is also working with Carnegie Mellon to establish a
research institute and postgraduate programs.
Steve Miller can be reached at stevenmiller@smu.edu.sg.
Ted Tschang can be reached attedt@smu.edu.sg.
|
|
Cambridge
Begins MPhil in Technology Policy
As
part of a series of MIT-Cambridge University cooperative activities in
education and research, The University of Cambridge has begun a new MPhil
degree program in Technology Policy. The program is being led by Bill
Nuttall, a physicist who prior to joining Cambridge in January 2002, was
Manager of Policy for the Institute of Physics.
The MPhil program provides students
with backgrounds in engineering or science with the knowledge and
skills required to provide competent leadership in the development and
deployment of technology. The programs emphasis is on dual
competency, offering students the opportunity to enhance their knowledge
in purely technical areas while teaching them to think beyond such considerations
by giving them the tools to manage its implementation in wider socio-economic,
regulatory and administrative contexts.
The nine-month programs structure
is as follows:
First Term (Michaelmas)
TP1: Introduction to Technology and Policy (Bill Nuttall, Jochen
Runde and Chris Hope)
TP2: Seminars in Technology Policy (Bill Nuttall)
TP5: Distribution Networks: Economics, Market Structure
and Strategies (Michael Pollitt)
Two elective modules
December
MOT&I: Management of Technology and Innovation (Nick Oliver)
Second Term (Lent)
TP3: Key Methods in Technology and Policy (Bill Nuttall,
David Reiner and Chris Hope)
TP7: Political Economy of Technology Policy (Christos Pitelis
and David Reiner) TP6: Risk Management and
Real Options (Stefan Scholtes) Two elective modules
Third Term (Easter)
TP4: Leadership, Negotiation and Consensus (Bill Nuttall,
Jochen Runde and Colin Gill) Dissertation Details
on the new program can be found at http://www.jims.cam.ac.uk/
programmes/mphil_techpol/
mphil_techpol_f.html.
MacArthur
- continued from pg. 1
SCS), Kathleen Carley (SCS/EPP),
Baruch Fischhoff (SDS/ EPP), Mitchell Small (CEE/EPP), and Rahul Tongia
(SCS/ EPP), are also undertaking studies.
The grant will allow several EPP Ph.D.
students to explore important security dimensions in civil systems they
are studying. For example, Hisham Zerriffi is exploring the added security
that can be achieved through the use of distributed generation in electric
power systems, and Elaine Newton is exploring technical and policy issues
related to the widespread use of advanced surveillance technology.
In addition to supporting research,
the grant will also help EPP to develop security-related seminars and
course offerings and a variety of educational offerings.
By providing research and educational
support, the MacArthur grant will help to raise the visibility of science,
technology, and security issues, enhance research on this policy agenda,
and serve as a magnet to draw new faculty members and associated specialists
to the field. |