Neil
A. Stiber, Decision-Making Tools for Environmental Cleanup
and Redevelopment
Committee:
Paul Fischbeck (SDS/EPP), Dick Luthy (CEE), Marina Pantazidou
(CEE), and Mitchell Small - chair (CEE/EPP)
Old contaminated
property has great potential for reuse. Site cleanup and
redevelopment can simultaneously satisfy objectives of
economic rebirth and environmental protection.
This dissertation
develops and demonstrates tools that assist decision making
for cleanup and redevelopment. An experience database
is used to develop predictive models that use limited
qualitative data to evaluate environmental risk at potential
redevelopment sites. A method for probability assessment
of uncertain decisions is developed which allows imperfect
models to be better understood and applied.
An expert-judgment,
site-screening tool that evaluates natural attenuation
as a remedial option for trichloroethene-contaminated
ground water is developed. This system includes a Bayesian
Belief Network model for the natural attenuation of trichloroethene
and beliefs elicited from 22 bioremediation experts. It
is used to identify key information needs and to investigate
expert dissonance. A Bayesian method for aggregating multiple
expert models by using posterior probability weights is
developed and demonstrated. A new scoring system for screening
trichloroethene sites is proposed.
These tools
are intended to facilitate redevelopment, provide insights
throughout the site redevelopment process, and influence
policy in real-time as governments set guidelines for
site cleanup and redevelopment. This dissertation shows
that decision analytic techniques can be applied to the
problems confronting environmental cleanup and development
by increasing the value of site investigation data.
Work supported
by the Howard Heinz Endowment, the Carnegie Mellon-University
of Pittsburgh Brownfields Center, and NSF Career Grant
CMS-9502546
|
|
J.
Jason West, Studies in Natural and Human System Response
Relevant to Global Environmental Change
Committee:
Cliff Davidson (CEE/EPP), Hadi Dowlatabadi - co-chair (EPP),
Dick Luthy (CEE), Spyros Pandis - co-chair (ChemE/EPP),
Mitchell Small (CEE/EPP), and Gary Yohe (Wesleyan Univ.)
This thesis examines
two important aspects of global change. Part 1 addresses
climate forcing by fine particles. Using a non-urban continental
aerosol, we estimate that the marginal forcing may vary
strongly with sulfate concentration, from 550 to +20 W
(g SO4)-1 at 80% relative humidity. Average measures of
forcing may therefore significantly overestimate the effect
of changes in sulfate concentration. Assuming thermodynamic
equilibrium, we estimate that the conditions for a nonlinear
response to changes in sulfate concentration are common
in the eastern US in winter, and uncommon in summer. Decreases
in sulfate concentration may therefore increase aerosol
nitrate and may be up to 50% less effective than expected
at reducing annual average PM2.5. The annual average marginal
forcing is not expected to vary over land masses by more
than a factor of four. In many areas of interest, it will
vary by less than a factor of two.
Part 2 develops
methods for assessing the economic impacts of sea level
rise, using the bounding cases of no foresight and perfect
foresight. We use a disaggregated analysis which includes
the effects of storms, and model market valuation and private
investor decisions dynamically. Using data from the National
Flood Insurance Program and a hypothetical community, we
estimate that the increase in storm damage due to sea level
rise is small (< 5% of total sea level rise damages), but
could become more significant under other reasonable assumptions
or where dune erosion increases storm damage.
Work supported
by a graduate research fellowship from the NSF and by NSF
grants ATM-9508051, ATM-9625718, BCS-9218045 and SBR-9521914,
the US DoE grant DE-FG02-95ER62105, the US EPA grant R-824793010,
and the EPRI grant RP-3441-14.
|
| Rahul
Tongia, Issues in Electric Power in India: Challenges and
Opportunities
Committee:
V.S. Arunachalam - chair (EPP/MSE/Robotics), Benoît Morel
(EPP), Granger Morgan (EPP/ECE/Heinz), and Shyam Sunder
(GSIA)
This thesis
explores three facets of Indian electric power. The current
regulatory environment and guidelines for independent power
producers and other generators is analyzed. Problems with
the existing guidelines are discussed, and improvements
are suggested.
India's nuclear
power program, based on indigenous materials and technology,
and fast breeder reactors, is represented as holding great
promise to meet energy needs. The technical validity of
the plan is examined. The analysis shows that breeding is
unlikely to occur at anywhere near the rates envisioned,
leading to slow growth. Domestic uranium reserves are limited.
To increase the share of nuclear power in the coming decades,
India should consider the construction of a number of large
thermal reactors based on indigenous and imported uranium.
Policy options for such changes to India's nuclear power
program are presented.
The third element
of the thesis provides an assessment of a gas pipeline from
the Middle East to supply natural gas to India and Pakistan.
Such a pipeline would be shared by both countries, and would
be a strong confidence building measure, offering a unique
opportunity for cooperation. As natural gas pipelines exhibit
significant economies of scale, a shared pipeline would
also offer the lowest price natural gas for both countries.
An overland gas pipeline does not depend solely on economic
viability, but on political acceptance as well. This study
addresses some of the potential concerns, suggesting options
for overcoming security of supply worries.
Work supported
by the Rockefeller Foundation and the W. Alton Jones Foundation.
_____________________________________________________________________ |